273 A.D. 939 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1948
Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Larkin, J., not voting, and Kimball, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint in the following memorandum: If the defendants-appellants may not be held liable unless their negligence was a proximate cause of the accident and injury, then I think that, as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to make out a case and that the complaint should have been dismissed. My view is, I think, supported by the rule laid down in Perry v. Rochester Lime Co. (219 N. Y. 60), Hall v. New York Telephone Co. (214 N. Y. 49), Morse v. Buffalo