History
  • No items yet
midpage
King v. State
42 S.E. 763
Ga.
1902
Check Treatment
Cobb, J.

The motion for a new trial was upon the general grounds only. The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and the discretion of the trial judge, exercised in overruling the motion for a new trial, will not be controlled.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent, and Candler, J., not presiding.

Case Details

Case Name: King v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 13, 1902
Citation: 42 S.E. 763
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.