History
  • No items yet
midpage
King v. Lyman
1 Root 104
Conn. Super. Ct.
1785
Check Treatment

And

by the Court.

Tbe evidence is irrelevant, for no intermeddling with tbe real estate of tbe deceased will make the defendant an executor de son tort. Nor will bis bolding and disposing of goods and chattels, conveyed by tbe deceased in bis lifetime; although tbe bill of sale of them was fraudulent; for though tbe bill of sale may be fraudulent as to creditors, it is good and valid between tbe parties, and upon these principles all evidence of this kind was excluded.

Case Details

Case Name: King v. Lyman
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1785
Citation: 1 Root 104
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.