History
  • No items yet
midpage
King v. Garnes
36 Ohio St. 2d 187
Ohio
1973
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Appellees contend that the filing was not timely because it was not filed within ten days after the administrator’s decision on reconsideration was mailed to appellant. However, an examination of the record discloses no evidence to show when the decision was, in fact, mailed, nor did the employer attempt to assert a date of mailing before the Board of Review.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, CorrigaN, SterN, Celebrezze, W. BrowN and P. Broww, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: King v. Garnes
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 26, 1973
Citation: 36 Ohio St. 2d 187
Docket Number: No. 73-639
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.