King v. EdwardsKing v. Edwards
The Family Court properly exercised subject matter jurisdiction over this proceeding, as the evidence in the record clearly established that the alleged family offense occurred in Brooklyn, and, in any event, a Family Court‘s subject matter jurisdiction over a family offense is not limited by geography (see Matter of Richardson v Richardson, 80 AD3d 32, 41-42 [2010]).
The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and that court‘s determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the record (see Matter of Creighton v Whitmore, 71 AD3d 1141 [2010]). Here, a fair preponderance of the credible evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supported a finding that the appellant committed the family offense of harassment