King v. Connevy
52 Ark. 115 | Ark. | 1889
The complaint stated a good cause of action, and the demurrer should have been overruled. If there was a fatal variance between the description of the horse in the mortgage, and the one taken under the order of delivery, it was a matter to be availed of at the trial. The variance between the two as set forth was immaterial in any event.
Reverse and remand for further proceedings.