History
  • No items yet
midpage
King v. Central Hardware Co.
85 So. 822
Ala.
1920
Check Treatment

This court is of the opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant. Taliaferro v. Lane, 23 Ala. 369; Abraham v. Nicrosi, 87 Ala. 173, 6 So. 293. This question was not raised or adjudicated in this case on the former appeal. 200 Ala. 209, 75 So. 967.

Reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity herewith.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: King v. Central Hardware Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 3, 1920
Citation: 85 So. 822
Docket Number: 4 Div. 876.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.