King v. Buskirk, No. 584

No. 584 | SCOTUS | Oct 27, 1913

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Fay v. Crozer, 217 U.S. 455" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1910-05-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/fay-v-crozer-97247?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="97247">217 U. S. 455, 456, and cases cited; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1909-01-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/waters-pierce-oil-co-v-texas-no-2-96942?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96942">212 U. S. 112, 117-118.

Mr. Maynard F. Stiles for the appellant. Mr. Frank Cox and Mr. W. B. Lilly for the defendants in error.