History
  • No items yet
midpage
King v. Buskirk
34 S. Ct. 316
SCOTUS
1913
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455, 456, and cases cited; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Waters-*736Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 117-118.

Mr. Maynard F. Stiles for the appellant. Mr. Frank Cox and Mr. W. B. Lilly for the defendants in error.

Case Details

Case Name: King v. Buskirk
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 27, 1913
Citation: 34 S. Ct. 316
Docket Number: No. 584
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.