History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kincy v. Petro
601 Pa. 315
Pa.
2009
Check Treatment

*316 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of May, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether under Pa.R.C.P. 213(a) a trial court order, which states that two separately docketed cases involving different plaintiffs and different theories of liability are “consolidated for all purposes,” and does not otherwise specify that a joint trial of the cases is to be held, operates automatically to merge the pleadings filed in the separate cases?

Case Details

Case Name: Kincy v. Petro
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 19, 2009
Citation: 601 Pa. 315
Docket Number: Appeal No. 596 EAL 2008
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.