History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kimmons v. State
190 So. 2d 308
Fla.
1966
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, 178 So.2d 608, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, *309that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Kimmons v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Sep 21, 1966
Citation: 190 So. 2d 308
Docket Number: No. 34781
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.