History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kimmey v. Calloway
52 Ala. 222
Ala.
1875
Check Treatment
JUDGE, J.

Our understanding of the evidence, as it is set out in the bill of exceptions, is that the declarations of the defendant were permissible as rebutting testimony. The court therefore had not the discretion to impose as a condition to their introduction, that the plaintiff should first examine the defendant as to whether he had ever had such a conversation.

Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Kimmey v. Calloway
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1875
Citation: 52 Ala. 222
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.