History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kimbark v. . Waldemar Company
217 N.Y. 610
| NY | 1916
|
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN and CARDOZO, JJ. Dissenting: SEABURY, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Kimbark v. . Waldemar Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 18, 1916
Citation: 217 N.Y. 610
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.