History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kim v. O'Toole, Jr.
1:20-mc-91611
D. Mass.
Aug 2, 2021
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 1:20-mc-91611-FDS Document 6 Filed 08/02/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ____________________________________

)

OAK-HEE KIM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case No. v. ) 20-mc-91611-FDS )

GEORGE A. O’TOOLE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAYLOR, C.J.

Petitioner Oak-Hee Kim is a frequent pro se filer who has been enjoined from filing new actions in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts without first obtaining leave of court. See Kim v. MCAD et al. , 1:15-cv-12309-WGY, December 5, 2017 Order of Enjoinment (the “Order”). According to the Order, when seeking leave to file, Kim is required to provide a “certification under oath that there is a good faith basis for the proposed filing, and provide reasons supporting the filing.” Id.

The petition here recites that “Petition for leave to file documents with certification under oath that there is a good faith basis for the proposed filing to the Court.” However, the certification was not under oath (that is, it was not signed under the pains and penalties of perjury). Furthermore, the purported reasons provided in the petition are conclusory assertions and are insufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Order. Furthermore, the proposed complaint is not a “short and plain” statement of claim as required by Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court denies Kim’s request to be relieved of the requirement of complying with Rule 8 (and other Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). Finally, and in any event,

Case 1:20-mc-91611-FDS Document 6 Filed 08/02/21 Page 2 of 2 as best the Court can discern the complaint is largely, if not entirely, time-barred, detailing events stretching back to events that allegedly occurred more than five, and in some cases up to twenty, years ago.

Accordingly, the petition is hereby DENIED and the matter is DISMISSED. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot. This Miscellaneous Business Docket action is CLOSED.

So Ordered.

/s/ F. Dennis Saylor IV F. Dennis Saylor IV Dated: August 2, 2021 Chief Judge, United States District Court

2

Case Details

Case Name: Kim v. O'Toole, Jr.
Court Name: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Date Published: Aug 2, 2021
Docket Number: 1:20-mc-91611
Court Abbreviation: D. Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.