Kilpatrick v. State
622 So. 2d 1032
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1993
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his sentences for robbery without a gun, aggravated assault and grand theft. We affirm appellant’s sentences as a habitual offender based on *1033King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 602 So.2d 942 (Fla.1992). We do remand, however, for appellant’s sentence to be amended to reflect proper credit for time served as required by Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941, (Fla.1993).

FRANK, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.