History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kies v. Tifft
1 Cow. 98
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1823
Check Treatment
Curia.

In our opinion, the Common Pleas erred. The defendants were hound to usé due diligence in collecting the money on the bond and mortgage, particularly as they were so directed by the plaintiff. They ought not to have suffered a term to pass, after the money fell due, without a prosecution. (Moakly v. Riggs, 19 John. 69.)

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Kies v. Tifft
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1823
Citation: 1 Cow. 98
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.