History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kientz v. Harris
117 Cal. App. 2d 810
Cal. Ct. App.
1953
Check Treatment
VAN DYKE, P. J.

In Kientz v. Harris, 3 Civil No. 8418 (ante, p. 787 [257 P.2d 41]) we held that upon the facts stated the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain the same. Motion to dismiss this appeal has been made upon the same ground. The facts in each case as to jurisdiction are identical. There is no need, therefore, to file an extended opinion herein.

Upon the authority of that case, the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal herein is dismissed.

Peek, J., and Sehottky, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Kientz v. Harris
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: May 15, 1953
Citation: 117 Cal. App. 2d 810
Docket Number: Civ. No. 8417
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.