71 Pa. Super. 385 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1919
Opinion by
The wife of the plaintiff was a member of the defendant association. Sometime prior to her death she was in arrears $2.85 and at the time of her death she still owed $1.45. Under the by-laws, “Members owing over $1.95 and having received two weeks’ notice, shall be considered in arrears and will not become beneficial until after all arrearages are paid in full.” Having owed more than $1.45 and not having paid all arrearages, the defendant society contends that she was not beneficial at the time of her death. The learned trial judge in his opinion refusing judgment n. o. v. we think took the correct view “that, where the by-laws require notice to be given two weeks before the member’s dues amount to an ultimate figure and condition the forfeiture upon both the notice and the nonpayment, the burden of proving that notice was given is upon the association, and in the absence of
The question of notice therefore, is all important and is the only matter we need consider. The appellant argues that the plaintiff’s decedent had notice by reason of the fact that she was in possession of a pass book in which the payment of dues were, credited and that this was a continuing notice which bound her. If we assume for the purpose of the argument that the pass book is equivalent to notice, it is only notice as to matters therein contained. The pass book offered in evidence does not show the correct account between the member and the society. It shows credits far in excess of the amounts debited. No balance is struck and the dues are not charged. It certainly was the intention of the framers of the by-laws, judging by the language employed, that members should not be required to calculate the respective amount of the dues and the payments and thus keep informed as to their standing. The evident design was that when the nonbeneficial point was reached, the member should be apprised of the fact and if the pass book is to take the place of such notice, the account therein should on its face show that the member is in arrears and non-beneficial. That fact should appear in the book. The member should not be required to ascertain it by a calculation. Of course any one connected with an organization of this character can by constant attention keep himself informed as to his standing. No doubt many members do, but common experience is that many are careless and the' very purpose of the provision above quoted is to call the attention of such to the fact that the benefits which they intended to receive in the event of their death would not come to their beneficiaries unless the arrearages were satisfied.
The judgment is affirmed.
