Khalid v. ScagnelliKhalid v. Scagnelli
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about April 2, 2001, denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint,
Plaintiff was allegedly struck and injured by defendants’ truck while riding a bicycle on Manhattan’s Lower East Side on November 7, 2000. He was treated at Cabrini Hospital for a broken leg. Six days later, private investigator Don Guarcello was authorized by defendant Coca-Cola’s claims representative to offer plaintiff a settlement.
On November 15, in the presence of a social worker, Guarcello visited рlaintiff at the hospital and spoke with him, with the assistance of a nurse who spoke both English and Arabiс. Appearing to be in good spirits and expecting to be discharged shortly, plaintiff gave Guarсello his version of the accident. Guarcello then raised the prospect of a settlement, at which point plaintiff indicated that he had already consulted with an attorney who had been introduced to him by a friend. Guarcello informed plaintiff that he could not discuss the matter further, in light of his representation by counsel, to which plaintiff responded that he was going to dischargе the attorney, and would rather settle the matter than pursue legal action. At plaintiff’s behest, the nurse telephoned the attorney to tell him of plaintiff’s intention, but the person who answered the call reportedly “reacted rudely and refused outright to discuss anything with her.” Plaintiff then told Guarcellо that he would have his friend telephone the attorney and take care of the discharge.
The next day, November 16, Guarcello spoke with plaintiff, again with the assistance of the nurse аcting as interpreter, and was informed that plaintiff’s friend had notified the attorney that his services were no longer desired. Guarcello then negotiated a settlement for $30,000, in exchange for а limited release that excepted medical expenses, which would still be covered by defendants’ no-fault insurer. Plaintiff reiterated his desire to settle the matter quickly, without resort to legal аction.
Guarcello returned to the hospital on November 17 and obtained the notarized rеlease of plaintiff’s claim, this time in the presence and with the translation assistance of a United Nations employee who happened to be a patient in the same room. Plаintiff was identified on the documents as Mohamed Khalid Ahmed Alsabbagh, at an address in Jersey City. The check was delivered and subsequently cashed.
Unbeknownst to Guarcello, the instant $5 million lawsuit
Trial Term dеnied defendants’ motion “as a matter of public policy,” despite the lack of any affidаvit in opposition from plaintiff himself. Defendants’ appeal has gone unanswered.
It is unlawful to nеgotiate a settlement with a hospital patient within 15 days of sustaining injury, unless the patient has formally indiсated his intention to settle at least five days prior to signing the release (Judiciary Law § 480). However, a violation of this statutorily imposed cooling-off period does not automatically void such an agreement (see, Huntsman v Henry,
Notes
. Trial Term subsequently granted defendants’ motion fоr a change of venue to Westchester County.
. There is some indication that plaintiff might also have been unaware of the commencement of the lawsuit. The summons and complaint were dated November 15, and the bare-bones complaint bore the signed verification of counsel alone.
. The appeal was perfected promptly for the next available (September 2001) Term. On plaintiff-respondent’s motion, the appeal was adjourned to the Dеcember Term. Meanwhile, on September 21 a motion by plaintiff’s counsel to be relieved was granted in the new trial venue, Supreme Court, Westchester County. This Court was informed of that order on November 1, and efforts to contact plaintiff were unsuccessful.