197 So. 363 | Ala. | 1939
Under repeated rulings by this court it was permissible, after the defendant on cross-examination of the State's witness has brought out part of a transaction or conversation, for the State to show the entire transaction or conversation. Richardson v. State,
In Shamberger v. State,
The solicitor was then, over defendant's objections, allowed to show that the witness pointed out to the deputy sheriff and the solicitor the several places where the *2
body was placed and where it was finally weighted and thrown into the creek. This, of course, was but an effort of the State to bolster the testimony of its own witness by hearsay, which on the authority of Green v. State,
Under the well settled rule first above stated the court did not commit error in overruling defendant's objections to the testimony of the witness Upchurch, and the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the judgment.
The writ is granted; the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court.
Writ granted; reversed and remanded.
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, THOMAS, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.