History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kevin Robertson v. United States
16-2123
| 4th Cir. | Feb 2, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ciamporcero Avetta, Kavitha Bondada, Bruce R. Ellisen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Michael Joseph Salem, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to reopen his prior Chapter 7 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-01109-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Kevin Robertson v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 2, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2123
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.