Case Information
*1 TH E. HOTTL£
C-OUIU" Of APPGAUS rr - neeves 3"«snc6 t 3 2.00 c^oLOitosA lt) — Za lO —i.—« 3 -_ -n
fe § I SalditT TK, VIA IA.S. AAA i TiME To PtUe I of
Cause No . (W-i5-0M.«3i "
*2 Tk.;al CovlkT Wo. 2. THe c&agt TWE STArB of T'^as Saij HwTWNiog p ro >"
Appellant's M°tiom "To gx-rewptuas to
THAT THIS riffJ^ABLE £iMi«T £iCT£nD THC T//i/i£
TO FIl£ MIS SftlCF AnJ in 5».-.PPC2T 0? HIS d£QttcST SHOWS: I - APPtU-AW is A is kjctt '1. H AppEaflM- has wevm wqustBp p6*. ^^ c'v:tc^/0;J. w Mft
S. APPeU-AMT WflJ, Bee^ WrfSKeCBSMfc
,M O
crJ U.S. po3T^u mail- Por Oe/-.iAA/iersrri
AFFlPAf.- 7. *3 8. %elM SeeKs * (j.o) ^ ♦d*^ 4* prop^L ei 11*&4e -\w-e. /\jbrf«rn -(vU pp THAT *4 dATc the" ?0B- foP- - tLeeves
S*
D«*Tlt rcr Toes no. 10 a \anJjt op of -pHc of %M TDLjiON*. =! c: -\ *5 £ ?
£
O r- h m 1! H 2 X