History
  • No items yet
midpage
Keuthen v. Bremer
119 N.Y.S. 278
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1909
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The judgment follows the pleadings, and in both the parties for whom Bremer and Ring acted are correctly described as “Underwriters* doing business under the name or style ‘ New York and New England Underwriters at Lloyds of New York City.’” The judgment is in form one against certain individuals and not against an association, incorporated or not. We are not concerned with the effect that some other court may give such a judgment. The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Keuthen v. Bremer
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1909
Citation: 119 N.Y.S. 278
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.