132 Misc. 293 | N.Y. App. Term. | 1928
Although the tenant must be deemed to have consented to the entry by the landlord for the purpose of doing the work specified in the landlord’s letter delivered to the tenant in connection with the execution of the new lease, in the installation of the new hot water system the landlord entered upon the demised premises and interfered with their occupation, and the landlord’s acts constituted an actual partial eviction which as matter of law suspended the rent during the existence of such interference, unless the plaintiff acted with the tenant’s consent or was acting under a right reserved in the lease. (Harperley Hall Co. v. Joseph, 187 N. Y. Supp. 120.)
As far as the lease is concerned the only provision as to entry in point is the one permitting the landlord “ to enter and examine the condition of the premises, and to make such repairs and alterations as it shall deem necessary for the safety and preservation of the premises or building.” No evidence was given tending to show
All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and Levy, JJ.