Keooulay v. Transcore, Inc.Keooulay v. Transcore, Inc.
In an action to recover damages for unlawful retaliation in employment in violation of
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Under the Human Rights Law (
The defendants met their prima facie burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Consequently, the plaintiff also failed to establish his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied that branch of the plaintiff‘s cross motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Spolzino, J.P., Carni, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 30099(U).]