History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kent v. County of Hudson
251 A.2d 760
N.J.
1969
Check Treatment
Pee Cueiam.

The Appellate Division reversed a judgment entered for the defendant on a jury verdict, 102 N. J. Super. 208 (1968). We granted defendant’s petition for certification, 53 N. J. 23 (1968). We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. The issue not having been raised, we express no view as to whether evidence of negligence exists in the present record.

For affirmance^—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Soiiettino and Haneman—7.

For reversal—Hone.

Case Details

Case Name: Kent v. County of Hudson
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 3, 1969
Citation: 251 A.2d 760
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.