History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kent County Prosecutor v. Robert Emmett Goodrich Corp.
240 N.W.2d 242
Mich.
1976
Check Treatment

*1 Kent Prosecutor 1976]

KENT EMMETT COUNTYPROSECUTOR ROBERT GOODRICH CORPORATION (Calendar 7, 2). Argued Docket No. 55873. November No. 1, April Decided 1976. County City Attorney Plaintiffs Kent and the Rapids complaint against brought Grand defendant Robert Corporation injunctive Emmett Goodrich relief to the film "The Devil in Miss Jоnes”. The Kent Court, Wal, J., permanent Circuit John H. Vander issued a injunction. Burns, J., Appeals, T. M. The Court of P. and Mc- (Docket (Holbrook, J., Gregor, dissenting), J. reversed No. 18420). appeals. Plaintiff Held: sale, obscenity distribution, The civil statute is aimed at the printed paper materials, of written or picture not the exhibition of a motion Lindemer, J., Coleman, J., concurring, dissented on the grounds obscenity the civil statute is directed to the pictures reading exhibition of motion it to eliminate mo- say tion film is strained. The statute does not that the picture, photograph, figure writing forbidden are on paper paper. or book (1974) App 53 Mich 218 NW2d 771 affirmed.

Opiniоn op the Court Obscenity Obscenity 1. —Civil Statute. —Motion Pictures. barring sale, The civil statute is directed to distri- bution, acquisition printed paper of written or materials, (MCL exhibition of a motion film 27A.2938). 600.2938;MSA

Dissenting Opinion Lindemer, JJ. Colemаn and Obscenity Obscenity 2. —Civil Statute —Motion Pictures. The civil statute is directed to the exhibition of motion por References Points in Headnotes 2d, Lewdness, [1, Indecency, 9, 26, Obscenity 50 Am Jur 32. §§ 2d, 148,198, seq. 73 Am Jur Statutes §§ 271 et 396 pictures reading tо eliminate dim is 27A.2938). (MCL 600.2938; MSA strained *2 III, Johnston, Donald A. Chief Assistant Prose- cuting Attorney, plaintiffs.

Stephen M. for defendant. Taylor J. The issue is whether the civil obscen Levin, ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‍ity statute may applied to bar the showing of the film "The Devil Miss Jones”.1

The provides: legal "The chief any city, executive or office of village township prosecuting charter attorney county may institute and maintain an action in the against any person, circuit court enjoin corporation firm or the sale or further sale or the distribution or further distribution or the book, magazine, of pamphlet, comic book, story paper, writing, paper, picture, drawing, photоgraph, figure image printed written or matter of an lewd, indecent lascivious, filthy, disgusting, indecent or or which con- tains an article or instrument of indecent or immoral purports use or purpose.” to be for indеcent or immoral use or 600.2938;

MCLA MSA 27A.2938. "sale”, is aimed at "distribu- permanently enjoined showing The trial court of the film. The reversed, Appeals declaring: Court of injunction improperly granted "It is our conclusion that was law, statutory judicial, 'specifi- since there is no state either which cally depictions defines’ the of sexual conduct which the state regulate. judge power authoritatively The trial lacked the construe (1974). App 267, 275; the statute.” 53 Mich 218 NW2d 771 disposition unnecessary question. Our makes it to consider this Co, 77, 78; 131; R Neese v Southern 350 US 100 L Ed 60 67 (1955); Co, 129, 132; Alma Co v Motor Timken-Detroit Axle (1946). S Ct 91 L Ed 128 Kent "acquisition possession” tion”, of written or printed papеr ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‍ materials, not the exhibition of a ("book, magazine, pamphlet,

Read in context writing, story paper, paper, picture, comic drawing, photograph, figure image writ- matter”) picture, photo- ten or graph, the words

figure image picture, photo- a mean figure graph, paper writing paper, on — paper, magazine paper, photographic paper. book Our construction the statute is reinforced "acqui- "sale”, "distribution”, use the verbs possession”. sition or Those words do describe of a motion film. A film is producer directly distributed or licensed through a distributor to an exhibitor who shows or public. exhibits the film An to the exhibitor does viewing not "sell” or "distribute” the film to the *3 public. "acquisition possession”

The words or in context appear permanent acquisition directed at the and possession2 prohibited of the material rаther than possession temporary the who, of one like a motion picture any acquire exhibitor, does at not time or possess any interest in the material and who is required shortly. to return it significant gist

In this cоnnection that the complaint against picture of the tor is the a motion exhibi- allegedly obscene mate-

acquisition possession. rial, not its mere Michigan’s obscenity statute reveals its purpose ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‍picture to the cover exhibition of motion the observed that power 2d protects [2] In 542 individual Stanley Georgia, to (1969), regulate obscenity right the United States "[i]t in the to receive information and ideas”. is now well established privacy "does of his own home”. The Court also 557, Supreme not 568, 564; extend to mere Court held that the possession by Constitution the states’ Ed 22 L 253 396 256 "show” verb inclusion of film by film”.3 noun "motion present its took The сriminal 265).4 (1957 The civil PA in 1957 form 126).5 (1958 PA 1958 in enacted was first lends, sells, gives away, knowingly distrib- "Any person either who sell, lend, give away, utes, distribute, either to or offers shows or transmutes transmute, intent in his with or has or show transmute, distribute, lend, or sell, give away, show or to either advertise in loan, gift, indecent, per, knowingly manner, offers for either any or who otherwise obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy distribution, any or sale or newspa- book, magazine, pamphlet, or masochistic sadistic record, drawing, picture, phonograph story paper, writing, paper, recording film, image, tape figure, wire or photograph, motion written, indecent character аny matter of an or recorded require to be may may or other means mechanical or not which representations sensory auditory, of such visual transmuted into character, misdemeanor, upоn guilty conviction shall of a shall be county jail not more than 1 punished by imprisonment for in the $1,000.00, by both such fine and year imprisonment. by not more than a fine of section, possession purpose of or more identical "For the of this lewd, lascivious, obscene, filthy any copies, or 6 or more articles of story paper, writing, newspaper, magazine, pamphlet, indecent paper, picture printed slide, record, picture drawing, photograph, phonograph motion written, recording, any film, tape figure, image, wire or prima shall be of an indecent or recorded matter sell, lend, give away, рossession with intent to evidence of facie 750.343a; distribute, 28.575(1); thing.” MSA MCLA show or transmute 217, 265, 1961 PA PA as amended added 64, 1964 PA 143. PA 4, fn infra. For text of 1957 act see 4 distributes, sells, lends, gives away, "Any person shows or show or who distribute, sell, lend, away, give or оffers transmutes transmute, away, lend, sell, give intent in his or has manner, distribute, transmute, or advertise show distribution, loan, gift, sale or who otherwise offers book, magazine, pam- lewd, lascivious, phlet, disgusting filthy, indecent or record, phonograph paper, writing, paper, newspaper, story film, figure, image, drawing, photograph, wire picture, or indecent other means to be transmuted written, printed recording matter of an tаpe or recorded require may mechanical character which sensory repre- auditory, into visual *4 misdemeanor, character, guilty and shall be of a of such sentations jail county punished by imрrisonment in the upon conviction shall be $1,000.00, year by or than a fine of not more for not more than by imprisonment.” 1957 PA 265. both such fine 2 of the 1958 act read: Sections 1 and county, any township any city, village, in charter 1. Where "Sec. Kent Opinion op the Court expressly earlier statute criminal covers "pho film”, nograph record”, "motion "wire or tape recording”, "or recorded matter”. The civil does not significantly statute include striking those words. is even more This when the descriptive placed of is language the two acts side side wording and it seen that the is of the in the civil materials covered statute follows in sequenсe language of the precise the noticeable elimination of "news ("comic substituted), paper” book” "phonograph record”, film”, "motion "wire or tape re cording” "or matter”. recorded Whether these de letions were proceedings because under the civil maintained be chief execu "[t]he or legal village tive of any city, officer or charter township” prosecuting as well as the attorney does reason, appear; whatever is apparent the Legislature chose to limit the operative of effect civil statute.

The civil obscenity statute is not direсted to the exhibition of a motion person, corporation firm or sells or is about to sell or with ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‍intent to sell or distribute or distributes distribute or has in his acquire possession about to with intent to sell or distribute

book, magаzine, pamphlet, paper, story writing, paper, comic picture, drawing, photograph, figure, image printed written or obscene, lewd, lascivious, of matter filthy, an indecent disgusting, indecent or or which contains an article or instru- purports ment of indecent or immoral use or to be for indecent or purpose, county immoral use or the circuit chancery court of such in jurisdiction adjudicate upon shall have and exercise the lawful propriety sale, distribution, possession acquisition of such under provisions in enjoin and same accordance with the of this act and to adjudged propеr. if not to lawful and legal any city, village "Sec. 2. The chief executive of office township prosecuting attorney county may charter institute against person, maintain an action the court such firm or corporation enjoin sale further sale or the or further distribution distribution or the any book, magazine, pamphlet, paper, picture, drawing, photograph, figure book, story paper, writing, comic written or matter an indecent character.” PA 126. *5 253 Lindemer, J. Dissenting affirmed. Appeals is

The Court of Fitzgerald, Kavanagh, J., and Williams C. Levin, J. JJ., concurred with in the decision of Ryan, J., no this part took case.

Lindemer, (dissenting). The construction J. rigidly more examinеd always criminal statutes is us to that of Justice Levin asks than civil statutes. Legislature regulate desired believe that lewd, lascivious, filthy, that inde- through the disgusting extensively cent or more my opinion It is process than civil. distribution of such material that statute’s of "The Devil Miss Jones”. covers exhibition reading that my opinion It further film is eliminate say The statute does not the words strained. image” a photograph, figure mean "picture, figure writing on picture, photograph, brings To so hold to mind paper paper. or book Mr. Bumble who remarked: * * * that, ass, supposes

"If the law the law is a a idiot.” Oliver Twist Charles Dickens. California, 2607;

Miller (1973), L Ed 2d establishes the standards is di- applicable here. civil rected to the exhibition ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‍of motion Appeals The Court of should be reversed. Coleman, J., Lindemer, concurred with J.

Case Details

Case Name: Kent County Prosecutor v. Robert Emmett Goodrich Corp.
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 1, 1976
Citation: 240 N.W.2d 242
Docket Number: 55873, (Calendar No. 2)
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.