History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kenney v. Kunneman
397 So. 2d 1195
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1981
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We conclude that only one of appellant’s points on appeal has merit. We therefore affirm the order of the trial court with the limited exception that appellant be permitted to amend his complaint to attempt to state a cause of action for wages and benefits, if any, accrued and unpaid at the time of termination of his employment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., and WARREN, LAMAR (Associate Judge), concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Kenney v. Kunneman
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 6, 1981
Citation: 397 So. 2d 1195
Docket Number: No. 80-1689
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.