11665 | 6th Cir. | Feb 19, 1953

202 F.2d 954" date_filed="1953-02-19" court="6th Cir." case_name="Kenneth S. Thomson v. Herberich-Hall-Harter Company">202 F.2d 954

Kenneth S. THOMSON, Appellant,
v.
HERBERICH-HALL-HARTER COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 11665.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1953.

Edward I. Wallach, Hugh Wells and Joseph Dembe, Cleveland, Ohio for appellant.

Herberich, Rowley & Taylor, Akron, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;

2

And it appearing that the findings of fact made by the District Court are supported by the record; that no compensable service was performed by the appellant to justify the so-called 'commission' in connection with the mortgage loan involved in the trustee's petition to sell real estate; and that the loan was usurious within the purivew of Section 8303 and 8306, Ohio General Code; but that the numerous other loans made by appellee to appellant had been paid and cancelled on or before July 31, 1947 and do not constitute a continuing transaction between the parties;

3

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the district Court. In re Proteau, 110 F. Supp. 904" date_filed="1952-03-17" court="N.D. Ohio" case_name="In re Proteau">110 F.Supp. 904.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.