History
  • No items yet
midpage
53 F.3d 80
5th Cir.
1995

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion January 26, 1995, 5th Cir., 43 F.3d 194)

Before JONES, HIGGINBOTHAM and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Appellant Kenneth J. Arenson petitions this Court on rehearing for a clear ruling on his claim to attorney’s fees, interest on his judgment, and relief based on his Title VII claim. For purposes of clarification, we confirm that Arenson is entitled to attorney’s fees as a prevailing party at trial and on appeal and to interest. We remand to the district court for determination of a reasonable fee and appropriate interest. However, Appellant’s request for Title VII relief is denied because Arenson waived his Title VII claim by failing to seek a ruling on that issue from the Arenson I panel.

Except as specifically granted above, Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. This case is REMANDED to the district court for determination of a reasonable attorney’s fee and appropriate interest.

Clarification GRANTED; case REMANDED.

Case Details

Case Name: Kenneth J. Arenson v. Southern University Law Center
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: May 11, 1995
Citations: 53 F.3d 80; 1995 WL 283759; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10740; 93-3544
Docket Number: 93-3544
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In