History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kennedy v. Kelly
119 Minn. 531
Minn.
1912
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

An instrument purporting to be the will of Catherine Myler was presented for probate and allowance to the probate court of Ramsey county. Mary Kennedy, an adopted daughter of deceased, Mary Mullaney, a sister, Maurice J. Dore, a nephew, and Johanna Grace, a niece, fthed objections to the probate of the instrument on the grounds that it was not duly executed, want of testamentary capacity, and undue influence. The probate court admitted the will. The objectors appealed to the district court, where the issues were tried by the court without a jury, and a decision made affirming the order and judgment of the probate court. The objector Mary Kennedy appealed to this court from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

We have carefully considered the evidence, and reach the conclusion that the interests of justice will be best served by another trial. Whthe the testimony is to a large extent conflicting, both on the question of the mental capacity of the alleged testator, and on the question of whether the instrument was fully executed as required by statute, there is so much in the record to indicate the physical and mental incapacity of Mrs. Myler, such a lack of a good reason for disinheriting her adopted daughter, and so much doubt whether the instrument was legally executed, that we feel that the case should be tried again.

Order reversed, and new trial granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Kennedy v. Kelly
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jul 19, 1912
Citation: 119 Minn. 531
Docket Number: Nos. 17,698—(201)
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.