History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kennedy-Stroh Corp. v. Davis
72 Pa. Super. 381
Pa. Super. Ct.
1919
Check Treatment

Opinion by

Head, J.,

The opinion filed by Judge Shafer in the court below discharging the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense briefly, but quite clearly, sets forth the facts out of which the present controversy arises. Prom those facts he deduces the legal principle which controlled his action in the disposition of the case.

We are all of the opinion the conclusion he reached was a correct one and we can perceive nothing of value we could add to his opinion. We accordingly adopt it as expressive of the reasons why we affirm the judgment. The assignments of error are overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Kennedy-Stroh Corp. v. Davis
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 17, 1919
Citation: 72 Pa. Super. 381
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 97
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.