Kendig v. Roberts
187 Pa. 339
Pa.
1898
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam,

This case was ably and correctly tried. Our consideration of the record, with special reference to each of the specifications, has satisfied us that neither of them can be sustained. All that can be profitably said in relation to either of the questions involved is contained in the opinion of the learned trial judge refusing the motion for new trial and directing judgment on the •verdict.

For reasons there given the specifications are overruled and judgment affirmed.