Kelly v. State

124 So. 2d 844 | Miss. | 1960

Hall, J.

This case presents purely a question of fact as there was testimony sharply conflicting and the jury had decided the case on this undisputed testimony. That being true, the judgment of the lower court should be, and it is, hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Lee, Arrington, Gillespie and McElroy, JJ., concurring.