No. Y-101 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Nov 5, 1975
On this appeal from a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance, we have considered appellant’s assertion that the traffic arrest to which the search was incident was a pretext for the search, in the sense described and condemned in State v. Holmes, 256 So. 2d 32" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1971-12-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-holmes-1130776?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1130776">256 So.2d 32 (Fla.App.2nd, 1972), cert. disch., 273 So. 2d 753" court="Fla." date_filed="1972-12-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/holmes-v-state-1099927?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1099927">273 So.2d 753 (Fla.1973), and consequently that the
Affirmed.