Kelly v. StateKelly v. State
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Patti Englander and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of sexual battery contrary to
Since notice of appeal vested exclusive jurisdiction in this court, (State ex rel. Faircloth v. District Court of Appeal, Third District, 187 So.2d 890 (Fla. 1966)) the trial court did not have jurisdiction to correct the initial sentence. Although the sentencing alternatives under
IT IS SO ORDERED.
McCORD, C.J., and MELVIN and BOYER, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
By motion for rehearing appellant urges that we overlooked and failed to consider his contention that certain testimony adduced at the trial constituted an impermissible comment on his constitutional right to remain silent, citing Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1976) and Shannon v. State, 320 So.2d 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). We have not overlooked nor failed to consider that point, but our review of the record reveals it to be without merit.
Petition for rehearing is denied.
McCORD, C.J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.