History
  • No items yet
midpage
Keith MacHinery Corp. v. South Plainfield
91 N.J. Super. 469
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1966
|
Check Treatment
91 N.J. Super. 469 (1966)
221 A.2d 47

KEITH MACHINERY CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD AND JOHN BORI, TAX COLLECTOR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 13, 1966.
Decided June 17, 1966.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. John T. Keefe argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Edward J. Santoro, attorney).

Mr. Robert Silver argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder, Silver & McCurley, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Gerofsky in his opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Keith MacHinery Corp. v. South Plainfield
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Jun 17, 1966
Citation: 91 N.J. Super. 469
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.