104 Ky. 119 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1898
delivered the opinion oe the court.
The evidence in this case authorized the court to refuse to set aside the deed which Mrs. Keiser made her son William Gates for land, and also the one which she made to Munch and wife. In consideration of the payment of certain sums by the grantees, and the further consideration that her son William pay her $100 per annum during her life, and that Munch and wife would pay her a like sum per annum during her life, the deeds were made.
It is insisted that the $200 which was to be paid annually by the grantees to Mrs. Keiser is not subject to attachment by her judgment creditors, because it is too uncertain and intangible; that it is a contingent liability. The amount which the vendees will ultimately have to, pay Mrs. Keiser is uncertain, because the time of her death can not be foretold. It is, however, certain that they are to pay $200 per annum, and that liability continues until her death, which is an event that is certain to happen. .The liability of the vendees can not be terminated at their will. They can not prevent its enforcement. Hence, their liability is fixed and certain. Their liability does not become fixed by a contingent event, but it is, however, to be terminated when a certain event happens. If the vendees had failed to pay the sums which they had severally contracted to pay Mrs. Keiser, the court could have, by appropriate proceedings, enforced them. The debt which the vendees owe Mrs. Keiser is no more intangible than any other chose in action. Counsel for appellants cites section 555, Drake, Attachm., to sustain his position. It is said by the author, in that section, “that, when it is contingent whether the garnishee will ever owe the defendant money, he can not be made liable.” We think this is a well-settled doctrine. In