Kehoe v. SegalKehoe v. Segal
—In an action to recover dam
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
To hold a subcontractor or statutory agent of the owner or general contractor absolutely liable for violations of Labor Law §§ 240 and 241, there must be a showing that the subcontractor had the authority to supervise and control the work giving rise to these duties (see, Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,
Here, there exist issues of fact as to whether the defendant Paul Kelloff was a subcontractor of the third-party defendant, J.C. Construction Management Corporation, and whether he had the authority to exercise supervision and control over the activity which produced the plaintiffs injury. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.