84 Iowa 415 | Iowa | 1892
I. It appears from the record that the petition was filed on the twenty-seventh day of'
The answer to the amendments was a general denial. It is claimed that the answer was filed too late. The cause was tried upon the theory that the petition and both amendments thereto were in issue. The plaintiff had not demanded a default against King for failure to answer the amendments. The answer was filed before the cause was finally submitted to the court for decision. It was submitted to the court with the argument of the defendant. We think, under these facts, there was no abuse of discretion in allowing the answer to be filed. Indeed, it is somewhat questionable whether any additional answer was required, in view of the single question which appears to us to be’ involved in this appeal.
II. It appears from th~e evidence that in the spring of the year 1887 the defendants entered into a
The decree of the district court is affiumed.