History
  • No items yet
midpage
Keet v. Murrin
235 A.D. 882
N.Y. App. Div.
1932
Check Treatment

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except MeNamee, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the admission of the evidence that the defendant “ settled ” with a witness, who had a corresponding claim against the defendant, was erroneous and prejudicial.

Case Details

Case Name: Keet v. Murrin
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1932
Citation: 235 A.D. 882
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.