128 S.E. 172 | S.C. | 1925
June 2, 1925. *217
The opinion of the Court was delivered by This Court is entirely satisfied with the reasoning and conclusions of the Circuit Judge (Judge Bonham) upon the merits of this controversy. The only question remaining is whether there was error in the order of Special Judge Lanham in referring the case to the Special Referee to take the testimony, over the objection of the defendants.
It has been decided by the Court in the case ofNewell v. Bankenship, 125 S.E., 420;
The judgment of the Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS and MARION concur. *218