History
  • No items yet
midpage
Keating v. McGivney
37 Idaho 797
Idaho
1923
Check Treatment
DUNN, J.

— The appeal in this case was dismissed for failure to file transcript in time, and petition for rehearing has been filed by appellant.

This case is in all respects similar to the case of Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co., ante, *798p. 793, 218 Pac. 789, and for the reasons stated in that opinion the petition for rehearing in this case is denied.

Budge, C. J., and McCarthy and William A. Lee, JJ., concur. WM. E. LEE, J.

— I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co., ante, p. 793, 218 Pac. 789.

Case Details

Case Name: Keating v. McGivney
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 4, 1923
Citation: 37 Idaho 797
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.