History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kearns v. Vahey
424 So. 2d 185
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1983
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Having considered this appeal on the merits, it is hereby dismissed by virtue of appellant’s having accepted the benefits of the final judgment. See, McMullen v. Fort Pierce Financing and Construction Company, 146 So. 567 (Fla.1933). The cross-appeal has also been considered and found to be without merit. The judgment is thus affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur;

Case Details

Case Name: Kearns v. Vahey
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 5, 1983
Citation: 424 So. 2d 185
Docket Number: No. 81-1985
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In