Kaywood Properties, Ltd. v. GloverKaywood Properties, Ltd. v. Glover
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff‘s contention that the decision upon which the
In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, “the power of the Appellate Division ... is as broad as that of the trial court ... and ... it may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account that in a close case” ... “the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983] [citations omitted], quoting York Mtge. Corp. v Clotar Constr. Corp., 254 NY 128, 133-134 [1930]).
The trial court‘s determination that the defendant did not hinder the plaintiff‘s ability to obtain subdivision approval or consent to a waiver of the condition is supported by the record, and we find no reason to disturb it (see Tornheim v Kohn, 31 AD3d 748 [2006]; Kahan v Sulaymanov, 24 AD3d 612 [2005]; Bucci v Bucci, 231 AD2d 665 [1996]).
The plaintiff‘s remaining contention is without merit.
Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.