Katz v. City of New YorkKatz v. City of New York
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J., upon decision of Eugene Nardelli, J.), entered February 10, 1994, and amended on or about May 11, 1995, which, upon a jury verdict finding, inter alia, plaintiffs’ damages attributable in equal proportion to the negligence of defendant City of New York and third-party defendant Anthony Grace and Sons adjudged that plaintiffs recover the full amount of the verdict, plus interest, costs and disbursements from defendant City and that defendant City have judgment over and recover from third-party defendant Grace the full amount of judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The relevant contract between the City and its general contractor, testimony at trial, and the police accident report support the jury’s conclusion that the City and its general contractor, Grace, were equally responsible for the injuries sustained by plaintiff.
Since the City and/or its agent created the hazardous condition, no prior notice to the City of the hazard was required in order to hold the City liable (see, Blake v City of Albany,
Third-party defendant Grace’s argument that it should not be required to fully indemnify the City and should bear only 50% of the liability should have been raised on its prior appeal of the July 12, 1993 order in this case, which culminated in this Court’s affirmance (