History
  • No items yet
midpage
20 N.Y.3d 1082
N.Y.
2013

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The courts below did not err as a matter of law in dismissing the complaint (see Innophos, Inc. v Rhodia, S.A., 10 NY3d 25, 30 [2008]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera.

Case Details

Case Name: Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP v. Reade
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 26, 2013
Citations: 20 N.Y.3d 1082; 987 N.E.2d 631; 965 N.Y.S.2d 71
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In