Karrin v. GottesmanKarrin v. Gottesman
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated December 31, 2003, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated March 4, 2004; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated March 4, 2004, is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.
The Family Court properly denied the father‘s objections to the order dated December 31, 2003. The record supported the Family Court‘s determination that the father failed to use his best efforts to obtain employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience (see Matter of Nappi v Nappi, 8 AD3d 388, 389 [2004]; Douglas v Douglas, 7 AD3d 481 [2004]; Beard v Beard, 300 AD2d 268 [2002]).
The father‘s remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.