History
  • No items yet
midpage
Karlin v. Pooley
122 Misc. 463
N.Y. App. Term.
1924
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

As the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court to render judgment upon confession is specifically limited to the rendering of such judgment “ in an action ” (Mun. Ct. Code, § 6, subd. 3) as distinguished from a judgment on confession rendered in the Supreme Court “ without action ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 540), and as no action was pending at the time of the entry of the judgment herein, it was error to deny the motion to vacate the judgment and the proceedings based thereon.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Mullan and Lydon, JJ.

Ordered accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: Karlin v. Pooley
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1924
Citation: 122 Misc. 463
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.