| N.Y. App. Div. | Jun 17, 1938

Order unanimously modified by denying that part of the motion which seeks to amend the decree of divorce nunc pro tunc as of February 4, 1925, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. (See Livingston v. Livingston, 173 N.Y. 377" date_filed="1903-02-10" court="NY" case_name="Livingston v. . Livingston">173 N. Y. 377, and Krauss v. Krauss, 127 A.D. 740" date_filed="1908-07-08" court="N.Y. App. Div." case_name="Krauss v. Krauss">127 App. Div. 740.) Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.