History
  • No items yet
midpage
Karl Auleciems v. Township of West Lakeland, MN
25-1387
| 8th Cir. | Nov 3, 2025
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Karl Auleciems appeals the district court’s [1] dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and tort action. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

NOTES

[1] The Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-

Case Details

Case Name: Karl Auleciems v. Township of West Lakeland, MN
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 3, 2025
Docket Number: 25-1387
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Add Column
No results found

Notebook

Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.

What are you researching?

Are reduced-form regression models acceptable evidence of class-wide impact at the class certification stage?
If Delaware is a company's place of incorporation, is that enough to establish personal jurisdiction and venue in Delaware?
What is the meaning of "after the pleadings are closed" in rule 12c of the frcp? Do pleadings include motions to dismiss counterclaims? Preferred jurisdiction is MA District court, but would take anything from the 1st circuit.